Reporting results

How to Report Cramér's V in APA 7 (With Example)

How to report Cramér's V with a chi-square test in APA 7: where it goes, no leading zero, how to judge its size by the table's df, and a worked example.

Cramér's V is the effect size for a chi-square test of independence on any table larger than 2 × 2. It runs from 0 (no association) to 1 (perfect association). APA 7 expects an effect size with every test, so V belongs in the same sentence as the χ² result.

What you need before you write a single word

  1. The chi-square result: χ², df, N and the exact p.
  2. Cramér's V.
  3. The smaller dimension of the table (rows or columns) minus 1, which sets the benchmarks.
  4. The percentages that show the pattern.

The APA 7 format template

There was a significant association between [variable 1] and [variable 2], χ²(df, N = XXX) = X.XX, p = .XXX, Cramér's V = .XX. [XX% of group A] [outcome], compared with [XX% of group B] and [XX% of group C].

All 53 templates, ready to paste with the italics set: the Rescue Vault, $27 →

Formatting rules reviewers actually check:

  • No leading zero: V = .29.
  • Italicize V (a Latin letter); χ² stays upright.
  • Use φ for a 2 × 2 table (it equals V there) and V for anything larger.

A worked example

180 students from three majors (60 each) sat the same exam: 45 psychology students (75%), 30 biology students (50%) and 25 economics students (42%) passed. The test gives χ²(2, N = 180) = 14.62, p < .001, Cramér's V = .29. Written up in APA 7:

There was a significant association between major and passing the exam, χ²(2, N = 180) = 14.62, p < .001, Cramér's V = .29. Psychology students passed most often (75%), followed by biology (50%) and economics students (42%).

How big is it?

Cohen's benchmarks depend on the smaller table dimension minus 1 (df*):

df*SmallMediumLarge
1.10.30.50
2.07.21.35
3.06.17.29

In the example the table is 3 × 2, so df* = 1 and V = .29 is close to medium.

Mistakes reviewers catch

  • No effect size. A significant χ² in a large sample can reflect a trivial association.
  • Judging V with the wrong benchmarks. The thresholds fall as the table gets larger.
  • A leading zero or reporting φ for a table larger than 2 × 2.

Let KyroStat do the write-up for you

KyroStat reports the chi-square test with the right effect size for your table and writes the percentages into the sentence.

Frequently asked questions

Phi or Cramér's V? φ for 2 × 2 tables, V for larger ones. For a 2 × 2 table they are equal.

How do I report the chi-square test itself? See how to report a chi-square test of independence.

What if expected counts are small? Use Fisher's exact test.

Ready to turn your spreadsheet into results?

Create an account and run your first analysis in minutes. No install, no statistics course required.